PIPL Conjecture
Any restrictions that PIPL may impose on the Chinese government's ability to collect citizen data may simply become a foil for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to continue to collect data. How the CCP uses the new data protection rules to further regulate, or even suppress, the power of its national IT sector remains to be seen.
“Government control and access in China were major concerns before PIPL. Those concerns may become more significant with this new legal framework put in place.” said Gary Kibel, a partner at Davis & Gilbert LLP.
TechCrunch states that PIPL provides the Chinese regime with more attack surfaces to restrict local technology companies and that it will not waste any time attacking the common data-mining practices of both international and national technology giants.
Reuters pointed out that the Chinese Congress officially marked the passage of this law by publishing a column in the official media outlet "People's Court Daily". Quoting the article, it wrote: "Personalization is the result of a user’s choice, and true personalized recommendations must ensure the user’s freedom to choose, without compulsion. Therefore, users must be given the right to not make use of personalized recommendation functions.”
“If previous data regulations weren’t already a wake-up call for ad tech companies to transition toward first-party data, the new PIPL law surely will be once the law goes into effect,” said Charles Farina, head of innovation at Adswerve. “China’s decision to pass its new ruling is a direct result of consumers becoming frustrated with the mass collection of their data.”