It goes without saying that trans-Atlantic data transfer is big business.
It underpins more than $1 million worth of trade and investments each year, making it crucial to a US-EU economic relationship that is valued at $7.1 trillion. This also means that there is strong political support for data transfer capabilities on both sides of the pond.
Response to Schrems II Ruling
In this context, the Schrems II ruling - and its invalidation of the US-EU Privacy Shield - created a roadblock in 2020.
This decision had a particularly significant impact on the 5,000-odd US companies that relied on this data protection shield to conduct their own cross-Atlantic commerce without legal worries.
Indeed, many still think that a robust Privacy Shield II is all but impossible in the post-GDPR landscape.
But the deadlock on transatlantic data flows goes back further, also running back to Schrems I. And in much the same way, this invalidated the Safe Harbor agreement in 2015. In fact, Max Schrems argues convincingly that it goes back 23 years.
The arrival of TADPF will work to resolve this issue. It ultimately enables US companies to take advantage of business opportunities centered around EU resident online data.
Other EU Data Privacy Requirements to Consider
The decision acts as a separate tool with which to meet the justification requirements for data transfer under GDPR - a law that has real implications for digital marketers.
As such, it exists alongside other EU justification mechanisms, such as Standard Contractual Clauses, Binding Corporate Rules, and also the Codes of Conduct.
And with this compliance meaning that businesses will also meet all other global data privacy requirements, it's a fertile avenue to explore.
It’s a particularly useful avenue for small and medium-sized businesses, with the DPF program making personal data transfers from the European Economic Area more affordable and also easier to do.